Iraq’s Judicial Authority: Between Claims and Reality!

Viewers: 11

Aso Rasoul Omar – Activist

After the fall of Saddam Hussein’s dictatorial regime, one of the most debated and controversial issues among some politicians and citizens has been the judiciary and the way courts deal with lawbreakers, corrupt officials, and mafias, which has placed Iraq’s judicial authority under serious question.

If we look carefully at the reactions of the government, political forces, and the judiciary, we can see that in many areas the rule of law and the authority of the state are being openly violated. A clear example of this situation is the arrest of some minor corrupt figures, while major corruption allegations, large-scale corruption, and the theft of public assets have been ignored. The names of senior figures and officials are involved in these cases, yet they have remained without judicial accountability.

This situation raises an important question: if all this corruption has existed, was the judiciary unaware of it? If it was aware, as several parliamentarians claim that they informed the judiciary, why were no legal steps taken? And if it was unaware, then this itself reflects the weakness of the judiciary in Iraq.

In any case, citizens’ trust in the judiciary becomes weaker, because an independent and strong judiciary is one of the most important pillars of a democratic state.

Therefore, from my point of view, the judiciary in Iraq has still not been able to demonstrate true independence and the effective implementation of justice. For this reason, judicial institutions must be protected from all forms of political and financial influence, and the law must be applied equally to ordinary citizens, political leaders, and corrupt officials alike. Only in this way can citizens’ trust in the state, the judiciary, and justice be restored.